The Rating is Back
After nearly a month of downtime, RatingBBW has resurfaced. While it isn't set to officially open until the 31st, I figured I'd give the current beta offering a look and give you my thoughts.
Before I get started on my critiquing, I have to mention that my initial thought is that it was an odd decision on the RatingBBW webmaster's part to take the entire site down while he built the new version (presumably) from scratch. That's a lot of lost ad revenue, and it's possible that he may not get back a large number of his former ten-thousand plus users. Unless he simply didn't have an old junk machine laying around he could throw PHP and MySQL on and use as a test server, there's not really any excuse for a month of downtime while he built the new version. It should have been a week of migration, tops.
Now that I've had my rant, lets get started. What you'll notice immediately is that the interface has gotten a complete overhaul. It has shed the nineties look, and moved into a far more modern style including a new, less blocky logo. It is far more visually pleasing, and not at the expense of bandwidth, which is a definite relief.
One thing previous users should quickly notice is that there is no longer a SSBBW or BHM classification. There are simply BBWs and Admirers now. It will be interesting to see how the consolidation of classes affects the average ratings, especially since the sidebar only contains a top 4 of each category as opposed to the top 20 in each category on the old version.
After looking over the front page, it was time to sign up. All old accounts are gone, so I have to start fresh. The sign-up page has a few new fields that pertain to favorite movie and the like, making it seem more like a personals site than before. The "link" field is gone, and you cannot create hyperlinks in your intro, so you're stuck hoping people will copy and paste. Good luck with that. Up to this point, everything still looks pretty clean and polished for the most part. Lets hope this pattern continues.
I have to say, this site has the best User Agreement I've ever seen. It goes as follows:
You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of the password and account and are fully responsible for all activities that occur under your password or account.
YOUR USE OF THE SERVICE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS.
Essentially, don't give out your password, and the service may vanish at any time and/or blow up your computer. 10-4 Tim! In I go... after I check my email for the activation email... which it turns out has no activation link, and is simply my username and password in plain text. Wonderful. Now, in I go...
The rating is now represented by 10 squares that fill further to the right as your rating gets higher. I like the effect. There is a new "Stats" option which contains your raw score, your rank, and the list of people who have rated you. However, to see how many times you've been rated or to see a numerical average instead of the blocks, you still have to view your own profile, which is a bit of a pain.
The profiles are very nicely done. It contains the default photo to the left, with basic stats and information to the right and below. Above their photo and information are links to their secondary photos, videos, comments, and buddies, as well as a link to contact them via private message or email (if they allow it). Hopefully the internal private messaging system is more reliable than the previous incarnation.
As for the photos, you are no longer limited to three. I'm not sure what the limit is, but in addition to the default photo, there are ten upload fields in the "My Photo Album" section. The best advance, at least in my opinion, is that the smaller photos are actually thumbnailed now instead of just being the full size photos with the width and height tags changed. Now, users without broadband can actually look at profiles and top lists without screaming at their screen. Upon clicking a photo, it launches in a pop up window that allows you to rate the user.
When you click "Rate BBW," you're taken to a semi-anonymous rate system where you see the photo and a rate bar. You can rate the photo or can optionally look at their profile. Not loading entire profiles allows you to make a lot of rates very quickly and lessens bias due to other information on the profile.
Overall, it appears the new RatingBBW is modeled after MySpace-style social sites, but with a heavier concentration on rating photos. The only real gripe I have as of yet is that the rate box for 10 on a profile sometimes has the tendency to wrap down below the rest of the rate boxes. If one was to quickly go to rate a 10 and was not paying attention, they may accidentally rate a 9. That being the only real gripe is a lot to say for the improvements, considering the old site was bandwidth heavy, would timeout your session far too quickly, had a perpetually broken messaging system, and was just plain buggy. It's really an excellent new design, and hopefully the small issues will be worked out by the official launch.
--
Big Cray: Accept No Substitute
Edit [1/31/2007]: Forget everything I said about how he did well on the slick interface. It turns out he either stole from or uses the same template as PhotoVote.com and RateMyHumps.com. In addition, the wrapping issue with the 10 rate box was resolved due to him simply changing the layout of a profile to have everything under the picture. Still, the speed increase over the old site is very welcome, even if it is presented on a canned/stolen interface.


